Standish Planning Board Meeting Minutes
Welcome to the September 13, 2021 meeting of the Standish Planning Board.
CB
Charles Brown
0:52
We have a quorum with six Board members present. Deb Boxer is not here. The first item on the agenda is the approval of the meeting minutes from August 02, 2021 and August 16, 2021. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright to approve the minutes. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
3:40
The next item we have on the agenda is the approval of the Finding of Fact for William Day Jr. and Sons and Craig Woodbury for a six lot subdivision application, Whitetail Ridge Estates. Mr. Nappi made a motion to approve the FInding of Fact, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
5:21
First item under new business will be James Thompson, doing businesses as JNT Properties. This is located on Map 36, Lot 28.
JT
James Tompson
5:44
I own the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and I would like to change the designation of it as its listed as a restaurant and bar. W e're not going to use it for that anymore. So I'd like to just use easiest thing I can do with it some sort of a two unit designation, so that it'll make it more marketable if I decide to sell it.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
6:11
I think it's pretty straight forward.This application is for a multifamily use and is an allowable use in the zone. So it's listed as an exact use. This is permitted, and it's also an existing site. And that's where I think my memo tries to cover some detail, because it's a very small lot with very little parking access. And I will note, the letter that was submitted with the application had mentioned some parking to the rear of the building, which I did not include in my memo. And that's because there's no access to that parking except for across the adjacent property and through the parking lot of the building on the corner. The owner of that lot stated that they would not allow parking access from their lot. And at the moment, they're not allowing access to that parking area. So we can't consider that parking. But we do have other options as with the existing driveway that comes off Ossipee Trail. You can see more than one can parking space there, but there's some question as to exactly how much of that driveway is on the property and how much is encroaching on the neighboring property. Given the length of time this has been happening, it's not something that I'm looking for the Board to correct at this time, as there other options.
JT
James Tompson
9:13
Would that additional parking be in the breakdown lane on the easterly side of the site on Route 25.
JT
James Tompson
9:51
I wouldn't call it a breakdown lane because it is legal on street parking and people are explicitly allowed to park there. Starting at the back to the property line, how far does the driveway go in ?
JT
James Tompson
10:27
I think it goes back somewhere around 800 feet or so.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
10:52
The use of the structure shall comply with the applicable Standish Corner DIstrict frontage type standards to the greatest extent.. Why is that determined by that? I think that this is the greatest extent practical, and it's also the least parking requirements that I think we could possibly have for this building. And any other use that would be proposed would require more parking, to serve employees or customers, whatever may be in there. So I think that this is a reasonable request and good use of the property in terms of not being so restricted.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
11:43
Any of the Board Members, any questions, comments? Thoughts? I had the application, the list of items, the applicant has submitted . All I had was the site plan. I assume you have all what's the cover letter, site plan application.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
12:13
We do have the septic system design on file. We do have the application and a cover letter .
CB
Charles Brown
13:05
Jamie has owned that building for 40 years. It's been there as long as I can remember. There could be some prescriptive easement. We're not going to get into that as a Board.
JT
James Tompson
13:20
I think it's right on the lines there.
CB
Charles Brown
14:00
So I probably could pull it off the road and slide over onto the front lawn,
JT
James Tompson
14:04
You could easily get in and out with another vehicle and I haven't ruled out maybe removing that front entrance that sticks out on the side, my little mudroom thing on the front.I thought about just removing that from the building. Maybe somebody could park there if they had to, they could kind of be with traffic and pull right out. Just trying to put a bandaid on the whole thing.
CB
Charles Brown
14:38
So we don't have exterior drawings .It's not like there's no building. The same with the information and exterior material. It's an existing application. So where there are no exterior changes proposed. Mr. Struebing made a motion, seconded by Mr. Nappi to waive the submission requirements for subsection 181 dash 71.1 two foot contours. All in favor. Mrs. Whittemore made a motion to find the application complete, seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
15:57
Scott's gone through pretty well outlined requirements for that zone.
CB
Charles Brown
16:06
So if the board is comfortable, and we've addressed the parking issue, and everybody's comfortable with the staffs review, I went through and checked off all the items. I saw the only one I had a question on with parking. And we've discussed that. If so, entertain a motion as presented by staff, with the board moved to grant approval under the provisions of the Standish land use code. The site plan application submitted by James Thompson of JNT properties for the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and Standish Map 36 Lot 28. Having found it to meet the site plan review and criteria, is there a motion to find the application complete. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright, all in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
18:04
With finding the application complete, do I have a motion to grant approval of the application ? Mr. Struebing made a motion to grant approval of the application, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor
CB
Charles Brown
19:42
The second item on the agenda is Brian Fitzpatrick 30 Binford Road, Map 49, Lop 44. This application was granted approval back in 2019 and the approval has lapsed as there as not been any substancial start on any renovations. Mr. Fitzpatrick is seeking a second approval .
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
20:41
For formality, we need to reapprove this because it was not started within the time period allowed and the former approval was voided. It's not just that we put an extension of the approval, this is being treated as a brand new application, with no changes. We have to find the application complete and then approve it as well, technically what we're doing is just extending it, but we need to go through the same process as though this is the first time before us.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
21:25
Again, not an extension. So technically, this is a new application, or if something changed in the ordinance, which there have been no changes.
CB
Charles Brown
21:49
Do I have a motion to find the application complete ? Mrs. Whittemore made a motion seconded by Mr. Struebing to find the application complete. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
22:19
Staff has recommended to grant approval under the provisions of a standard land use code for the applications submitted by Kevin Nickerson on behalf of the applicant, Brian Fitzpatrick, for the tear down and rebuild of a structure to be located at 30 Binford Road with the finding of facts that it meets requirements of Section 237- 12, 237- 15 and section 237- 16, with conditions one through five as stated in the memo.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
23:28
The motion which you read, is great. And then just a comment. So the latest that I recommended was that that approval beyond the basis of the Board's previous 2019 approval, in the light of the fact that there are no changes to the ordinance or the application, which there are none.
CB
Charles Brown
24:31
Any further discussion by the board? Was that actually moved and seconded. Mr. Struebing made a motion to approve the application seconded by Mrs. Whittemore. All in favor. Mrs. Struebing made a motion to adjourn seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.
Rate transcript quality
00:1025:30
1x
5
5
help_outline
Welcome to the September 13, 2021 meeting of the Standish Planning Board.
CB
Charles Brown
0:52
We have a quorum with six Board members present. Deb Boxer is not here. The first item on the agenda is the approval of the meeting minutes from August 02, 2021 and August 16, 2021. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright to approve the minutes. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
3:40
The next item we have on the agenda is the approval of the Finding of Fact for William Day Jr. and Sons and Craig Woodbury for a six lot subdivision application, Whitetail Ridge Estates. Mr. Nappi made a motion to approve the FInding of Fact, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
5:21
First item under new business will be James Thompson, doing businesses as JNT Properties. This is located on Map 36, Lot 28.
JT
James Tompson
5:44
I own the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and I would like to change the designation of it as its listed as a restaurant and bar. W e're not going to use it for that anymore. So I'd like to just use easiest thing I can do with it some sort of a two unit designation, so that it'll make it more marketable if I decide to sell it.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
6:11
I think it's pretty straight forward.This application is for a multifamily use and is an allowable use in the zone. So it's listed as an exact use. This is permitted, and it's also an existing site. And that's where I think my memo tries to cover some detail, because it's a very small lot with very little parking access. And I will note, the letter that was submitted with the application had mentioned some parking to the rear of the building, which I did not include in my memo. And that's because there's no access to that parking except for across the adjacent property and through the parking lot of the building on the corner. The owner of that lot stated that they would not allow parking access from their lot. And at the moment, they're not allowing access to that parking area. So we can't consider that parking. But we do have other options as with the existing driveway that comes off Ossipee Trail. You can see more than one can parking space there, but there's some question as to exactly how much of that driveway is on the property and how much is encroaching on the neighboring property. Given the length of time this has been happening, it's not something that I'm looking for the Board to correct at this time, as there other options.
JT
James Tompson
9:13
Would that additional parking be in the breakdown lane on the easterly side of the site on Route 25.
JT
James Tompson
9:51
I wouldn't call it a breakdown lane because it is legal on street parking and people are explicitly allowed to park there. Starting at the back to the property line, how far does the driveway go in ?
JT
James Tompson
10:27
I think it goes back somewhere around 800 feet or so.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
10:52
The use of the structure shall comply with the applicable Standish Corner DIstrict frontage type standards to the greatest extent.. Why is that determined by that? I think that this is the greatest extent practical, and it's also the least parking requirements that I think we could possibly have for this building. And any other use that would be proposed would require more parking, to serve employees or customers, whatever may be in there. So I think that this is a reasonable request and good use of the property in terms of not being so restricted.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
11:43
Any of the Board Members, any questions, comments? Thoughts? I had the application, the list of items, the applicant has submitted . All I had was the site plan. I assume you have all what's the cover letter, site plan application.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
12:13
We do have the septic system design on file. We do have the application and a cover letter .
CB
Charles Brown
13:05
Jamie has owned that building for 40 years. It's been there as long as I can remember. There could be some prescriptive easement. We're not going to get into that as a Board.
JT
James Tompson
13:20
I think it's right on the lines there.
CB
Charles Brown
14:00
So I probably could pull it off the road and slide over onto the front lawn,
JT
James Tompson
14:04
You could easily get in and out with another vehicle and I haven't ruled out maybe removing that front entrance that sticks out on the side, my little mudroom thing on the front.I thought about just removing that from the building. Maybe somebody could park there if they had to, they could kind of be with traffic and pull right out. Just trying to put a bandaid on the whole thing.
CB
Charles Brown
14:38
So we don't have exterior drawings .It's not like there's no building. The same with the information and exterior material. It's an existing application. So where there are no exterior changes proposed. Mr. Struebing made a motion, seconded by Mr. Nappi to waive the submission requirements for subsection 181 dash 71.1 two foot contours. All in favor. Mrs. Whittemore made a motion to find the application complete, seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
15:57
Scott's gone through pretty well outlined requirements for that zone.
CB
Charles Brown
16:06
So if the board is comfortable, and we've addressed the parking issue, and everybody's comfortable with the staffs review, I went through and checked off all the items. I saw the only one I had a question on with parking. And we've discussed that. If so, entertain a motion as presented by staff, with the board moved to grant approval under the provisions of the Standish land use code. The site plan application submitted by James Thompson of JNT properties for the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and Standish Map 36 Lot 28. Having found it to meet the site plan review and criteria, is there a motion to find the application complete. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright, all in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
18:04
With finding the application complete, do I have a motion to grant approval of the application ? Mr. Struebing made a motion to grant approval of the application, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor
CB
Charles Brown
19:42
The second item on the agenda is Brian Fitzpatrick 30 Binford Road, Map 49, Lop 44. This application was granted approval back in 2019 and the approval has lapsed as there as not been any substancial start on any renovations. Mr. Fitzpatrick is seeking a second approval .
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
20:41
For formality, we need to reapprove this because it was not started within the time period allowed and the former approval was voided. It's not just that we put an extension of the approval, this is being treated as a brand new application, with no changes. We have to find the application complete and then approve it as well, technically what we're doing is just extending it, but we need to go through the same process as though this is the first time before us.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
21:25
Again, not an extension. So technically, this is a new application, or if something changed in the ordinance, which there have been no changes.
CB
Charles Brown
21:49
Do I have a motion to find the application complete ? Mrs. Whittemore made a motion seconded by Mr. Struebing to find the application complete. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
22:19
Staff has recommended to grant approval under the provisions of a standard land use code for the applications submitted by Kevin Nickerson on behalf of the applicant, Brian Fitzpatrick, for the tear down and rebuild of a structure to be located at 30 Binford Road with the finding of facts that it meets requirements of Section 237- 12, 237- 15 and section 237- 16, with conditions one through five as stated in the memo.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
23:28
The motion which you read, is great. And then just a comment. So the latest that I recommended was that that approval beyond the basis of the Board's previous 2019 approval, in the light of the fact that there are no changes to the ordinance or the application, which there are none.
CB
Charles Brown
24:31
Any further discussion by the board? Was that actually moved and seconded. Mr. Struebing made a motion to approve the application seconded by Mrs. Whittemore. All in favor. Mrs. Struebing made a motion to adjourn seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.
Rate transcript quality
00:1025:30
1x
5
5
help_outline
Welcome to the September 13, 2021 meeting of the Standish Planning Board.
CB
Charles Brown
0:52
We have a quorum with six Board members present. Deb Boxer is not here. The first item on the agenda is the approval of the meeting minutes from August 02, 2021 and August 16, 2021. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright to approve the minutes. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
3:40
The next item we have on the agenda is the approval of the Finding of Fact for William Day Jr. and Sons and Craig Woodbury for a six lot subdivision application, Whitetail Ridge Estates. Mr. Nappi made a motion to approve the FInding of Fact, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
5:21
First item under new business will be James Thompson, doing businesses as JNT Properties. This is located on Map 36, Lot 28.
JT
James Tompson
5:44
I own the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and I would like to change the designation of it as its listed as a restaurant and bar. W e're not going to use it for that anymore. So I'd like to just use easiest thing I can do with it some sort of a two unit designation, so that it'll make it more marketable if I decide to sell it.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
6:11
I think it's pretty straight forward.This application is for a multifamily use and is an allowable use in the zone. So it's listed as an exact use. This is permitted, and it's also an existing site. And that's where I think my memo tries to cover some detail, because it's a very small lot with very little parking access. And I will note, the letter that was submitted with the application had mentioned some parking to the rear of the building, which I did not include in my memo. And that's because there's no access to that parking except for across the adjacent property and through the parking lot of the building on the corner. The owner of that lot stated that they would not allow parking access from their lot. And at the moment, they're not allowing access to that parking area. So we can't consider that parking. But we do have other options as with the existing driveway that comes off Ossipee Trail. You can see more than one can parking space there, but there's some question as to exactly how much of that driveway is on the property and how much is encroaching on the neighboring property. Given the length of time this has been happening, it's not something that I'm looking for the Board to correct at this time, as there other options.
JT
James Tompson
9:13
Would that additional parking be in the breakdown lane on the easterly side of the site on Route 25.
JT
James Tompson
9:51
I wouldn't call it a breakdown lane because it is legal on street parking and people are explicitly allowed to park there. Starting at the back to the property line, how far does the driveway go in ?
JT
James Tompson
10:27
I think it goes back somewhere around 800 feet or so.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
10:52
The use of the structure shall comply with the applicable Standish Corner DIstrict frontage type standards to the greatest extent.. Why is that determined by that? I think that this is the greatest extent practical, and it's also the least parking requirements that I think we could possibly have for this building. And any other use that would be proposed would require more parking, to serve employees or customers, whatever may be in there. So I think that this is a reasonable request and good use of the property in terms of not being so restricted.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
11:43
Any of the Board Members, any questions, comments? Thoughts? I had the application, the list of items, the applicant has submitted . All I had was the site plan. I assume you have all what's the cover letter, site plan application.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
12:13
We do have the septic system design on file. We do have the application and a cover letter .
CB
Charles Brown
13:05
Jamie has owned that building for 40 years. It's been there as long as I can remember. There could be some prescriptive easement. We're not going to get into that as a Board.
JT
James Tompson
13:20
I think it's right on the lines there.
CB
Charles Brown
14:00
So I probably could pull it off the road and slide over onto the front lawn,
JT
James Tompson
14:04
You could easily get in and out with another vehicle and I haven't ruled out maybe removing that front entrance that sticks out on the side, my little mudroom thing on the front.I thought about just removing that from the building. Maybe somebody could park there if they had to, they could kind of be with traffic and pull right out. Just trying to put a bandaid on the whole thing.
CB
Charles Brown
14:38
So we don't have exterior drawings .It's not like there's no building. The same with the information and exterior material. It's an existing application. So where there are no exterior changes proposed. Mr. Struebing made a motion, seconded by Mr. Nappi to waive the submission requirements for subsection 181 dash 71.1 two foot contours. All in favor. Mrs. Whittemore made a motion to find the application complete, seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
15:57
Scott's gone through pretty well outlined requirements for that zone.
CB
Charles Brown
16:06
So if the board is comfortable, and we've addressed the parking issue, and everybody's comfortable with the staffs review, I went through and checked off all the items. I saw the only one I had a question on with parking. And we've discussed that. If so, entertain a motion as presented by staff, with the board moved to grant approval under the provisions of the Standish land use code. The site plan application submitted by James Thompson of JNT properties for the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and Standish Map 36 Lot 28. Having found it to meet the site plan review and criteria, is there a motion to find the application complete. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright, all in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
18:04
With finding the application complete, do I have a motion to grant approval of the application ? Mr. Struebing made a motion to grant approval of the application, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor
CB
Charles Brown
19:42
The second item on the agenda is Brian Fitzpatrick 30 Binford Road, Map 49, Lop 44. This application was granted approval back in 2019 and the approval has lapsed as there as not been any substancial start on any renovations. Mr. Fitzpatrick is seeking a second approval .
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
20:41
For formality, we need to reapprove this because it was not started within the time period allowed and the former approval was voided. It's not just that we put an extension of the approval, this is being treated as a brand new application, with no changes. We have to find the application complete and then approve it as well, technically what we're doing is just extending it, but we need to go through the same process as though this is the first time before us.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
21:25
Again, not an extension. So technically, this is a new application, or if something changed in the ordinance, which there have been no changes.
CB
Charles Brown
21:49
Do I have a motion to find the application complete ? Mrs. Whittemore made a motion seconded by Mr. Struebing to find the application complete. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
22:19
Staff has recommended to grant approval under the provisions of a standard land use code for the applications submitted by Kevin Nickerson on behalf of the applicant, Brian Fitzpatrick, for the tear down and rebuild of a structure to be located at 30 Binford Road with the finding of facts that it meets requirements of Section 237- 12, 237- 15 and section 237- 16, with conditions one through five as stated in the memo.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
23:28
The motion which you read, is great. And then just a comment. So the latest that I recommended was that that approval beyond the basis of the Board's previous 2019 approval, in the light of the fact that there are no changes to the ordinance or the application, which there are none.
CB
Charles Brown
24:31
Any further discussion by the board? Was that actually moved and seconded. Mr. Struebing made a motion to approve the application seconded by Mrs. Whittemore. All in favor. Mrs. Struebing made a motion to adjourn seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.
Rate transcript quality
00:1025:30
1x
5
5
help_outline
Welcome to the September 13, 2021 meeting of the Standish Planning Board.
CB
Charles Brown
0:52
We have a quorum with six Board members present. Deb Boxer is not here. The first item on the agenda is the approval of the meeting minutes from August 02, 2021 and August 16, 2021. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright to approve the minutes. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
3:40
The next item we have on the agenda is the approval of the Finding of Fact for William Day Jr. and Sons and Craig Woodbury for a six lot subdivision application, Whitetail Ridge Estates. Mr. Nappi made a motion to approve the FInding of Fact, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
5:21
First item under new business will be James Thompson, doing businesses as JNT Properties. This is located on Map 36, Lot 28.
JT
James Tompson
5:44
I own the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and I would like to change the designation of it as its listed as a restaurant and bar. W e're not going to use it for that anymore. So I'd like to just use easiest thing I can do with it some sort of a two unit designation, so that it'll make it more marketable if I decide to sell it.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
6:11
I think it's pretty straight forward.This application is for a multifamily use and is an allowable use in the zone. So it's listed as an exact use. This is permitted, and it's also an existing site. And that's where I think my memo tries to cover some detail, because it's a very small lot with very little parking access. And I will note, the letter that was submitted with the application had mentioned some parking to the rear of the building, which I did not include in my memo. And that's because there's no access to that parking except for across the adjacent property and through the parking lot of the building on the corner. The owner of that lot stated that they would not allow parking access from their lot. And at the moment, they're not allowing access to that parking area. So we can't consider that parking. But we do have other options as with the existing driveway that comes off Ossipee Trail. You can see more than one can parking space there, but there's some question as to exactly how much of that driveway is on the property and how much is encroaching on the neighboring property. Given the length of time this has been happening, it's not something that I'm looking for the Board to correct at this time, as there other options.
JT
James Tompson
9:13
Would that additional parking be in the breakdown lane on the easterly side of the site on Route 25.
JT
James Tompson
9:51
I wouldn't call it a breakdown lane because it is legal on street parking and people are explicitly allowed to park there. Starting at the back to the property line, how far does the driveway go in ?
JT
James Tompson
10:27
I think it goes back somewhere around 800 feet or so.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
10:52
The use of the structure shall comply with the applicable Standish Corner DIstrict frontage type standards to the greatest extent.. Why is that determined by that? I think that this is the greatest extent practical, and it's also the least parking requirements that I think we could possibly have for this building. And any other use that would be proposed would require more parking, to serve employees or customers, whatever may be in there. So I think that this is a reasonable request and good use of the property in terms of not being so restricted.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
11:43
Any of the Board Members, any questions, comments? Thoughts? I had the application, the list of items, the applicant has submitted . All I had was the site plan. I assume you have all what's the cover letter, site plan application.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
12:13
We do have the septic system design on file. We do have the application and a cover letter .
CB
Charles Brown
13:05
Jamie has owned that building for 40 years. It's been there as long as I can remember. There could be some prescriptive easement. We're not going to get into that as a Board.
JT
James Tompson
13:20
I think it's right on the lines there.
CB
Charles Brown
14:00
So I probably could pull it off the road and slide over onto the front lawn,
JT
James Tompson
14:04
You could easily get in and out with another vehicle and I haven't ruled out maybe removing that front entrance that sticks out on the side, my little mudroom thing on the front.I thought about just removing that from the building. Maybe somebody could park there if they had to, they could kind of be with traffic and pull right out. Just trying to put a bandaid on the whole thing.
CB
Charles Brown
14:38
So we don't have exterior drawings .It's not like there's no building. The same with the information and exterior material. It's an existing application. So where there are no exterior changes proposed. Mr. Struebing made a motion, seconded by Mr. Nappi to waive the submission requirements for subsection 181 dash 71.1 two foot contours. All in favor. Mrs. Whittemore made a motion to find the application complete, seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
15:57
Scott's gone through pretty well outlined requirements for that zone.
CB
Charles Brown
16:06
So if the board is comfortable, and we've addressed the parking issue, and everybody's comfortable with the staffs review, I went through and checked off all the items. I saw the only one I had a question on with parking. And we've discussed that. If so, entertain a motion as presented by staff, with the board moved to grant approval under the provisions of the Standish land use code. The site plan application submitted by James Thompson of JNT properties for the property at 2 Ossipee Trail East and Standish Map 36 Lot 28. Having found it to meet the site plan review and criteria, is there a motion to find the application complete. Mr. Struebing made a motion seconded by Mr. Wright, all in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
18:04
With finding the application complete, do I have a motion to grant approval of the application ? Mr. Struebing made a motion to grant approval of the application, seconded by Mr. Wright. All in favor
CB
Charles Brown
19:42
The second item on the agenda is Brian Fitzpatrick 30 Binford Road, Map 49, Lop 44. This application was granted approval back in 2019 and the approval has lapsed as there as not been any substancial start on any renovations. Mr. Fitzpatrick is seeking a second approval .
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
20:41
For formality, we need to reapprove this because it was not started within the time period allowed and the former approval was voided. It's not just that we put an extension of the approval, this is being treated as a brand new application, with no changes. We have to find the application complete and then approve it as well, technically what we're doing is just extending it, but we need to go through the same process as though this is the first time before us.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
21:25
Again, not an extension. So technically, this is a new application, or if something changed in the ordinance, which there have been no changes.
CB
Charles Brown
21:49
Do I have a motion to find the application complete ? Mrs. Whittemore made a motion seconded by Mr. Struebing to find the application complete. All in favor.
CB
Charles Brown
22:19
Staff has recommended to grant approval under the provisions of a standard land use code for the applications submitted by Kevin Nickerson on behalf of the applicant, Brian Fitzpatrick, for the tear down and rebuild of a structure to be located at 30 Binford Road with the finding of facts that it meets requirements of Section 237- 12, 237- 15 and section 237- 16, with conditions one through five as stated in the memo.
SH
Scott Hastings-Planner
23:28
The motion which you read, is great. And then just a comment. So the latest that I recommended was that that approval beyond the basis of the Board's previous 2019 approval, in the light of the fact that there are no changes to the ordinance or the application, which there are none.
CB
Charles Brown
24:31
Any further discussion by the board? Was that actually moved and seconded. Mr. Struebing made a motion to approve the application seconded by Mrs. Whittemore. All in favor. Mrs. Struebing made a motion to adjourn seconded by Mr. Nappi. All in favor.